Tuesday, November 28, 2006

The entry which is not an entry

Dear Readers,


As you have no doubt noticed, I have been incredibly in-active in regards to posting entries to my blog. My last entry was in late April of this year; it is now late November.

I could have posted entries, simply out of a sense of obligation. But, that is hardly the point of maintaining a blog, is it?

If I am inspired at a later date -- particularly when Gye Greene finishes his Dissertation, and we can once again engage in hijinks (musical, or otherwise) -- I will likely resume posting.

Until then... watch this space. On a quarterly basis, I suppose. ;)


--GG

Friday, April 28, 2006

Very short ''political orientation'' quiz

GG's dad sent this to several of us. It is a very short (ten items) self-diagnostic quiz, to determine where you are along two dimensions: Liberal/Conservative and Libertarian/Government Intervention.

I found myself fairly far along the ''Liberal'' end of the spectrum, and balanced between Libertarian and Government Intervention tendencies.


The quiz is here: http://www.self-gov.org/quiz.html


--TG

Political ''Conservatives''

Under the American political system, the term ''Conservative'' is a bit of a misnomer, as one who was truly conservative would also be consistent in their views and behaviors, across all subjections. Or at least, one would think so.

I found this quote to be very insightful:

Why is it that [Conservative] lawmakers are gung-ho for personal responsibility and government abstinence when it comes to healthcare, welfare, and minimum-wage laws -- but they can't vote "aye" fast enough when it comes to intrusively legislating morality?

Its original context is here.


--TG

Monday, April 17, 2006

Reasonably good movie

Last night we rented the movie ''Fever Pitch''. In brief, Drew Barrymore plays a workaholic thirty-year-old, and Jimmy Fallon plays a thirty-something who is an extremely nice, very sweeet guy. The question arises: Why is he still available? What is wrong with him?

The answer is that he is obsessed with baseball.


Although it was billed as a ''romantic comedy'', it was not particularly funny. Although there were a few amusing moments, there were very few laugh-out-loud moments.

That said, it was a reasonably sweet movie, and reasonably enjoyable. It was a ''pretty good'' movie, and was in no way a ''stinker''. Thus, it was worth getting if you are at the video rental store and can't think of anything else. It might be of particular interest to those who are particularly enamoured with baseball.


--TG

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Gadget for Gye Greene?

Although the LED is blue, not green, I still believe that Gye Greene would appreciate this:

http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/gear/8122/


For US$15, I think the price is very reasonable. :)


--TG

Thursday, April 06, 2006

Missed the date

Well, that is sad: I missed the one-year anniversary of starting this blog. I just now went back and checked, and my first entry was on 6 March, 2005.

Ah well: 6 April can be my ''1+1'' anniversary -- one year, plus one month. :)


--TG

Monday, April 03, 2006

A change in the weather

After a few days of being pleasantly cool, the weather has reverted -- temporarily, we hope -- to warmer than comfortable.

The last few days were largely overcast, punctuated by drizzle. Sunday was the exception, with some warmth.

Today began cool, but by 10am was warm, verging on hot.

It is nearly 9:30 at night, and is 82F (27C) indoors.

As I say: warmer than we would like. And, no breeze.


--TG

Sunday, April 02, 2006

Guerrilla antismoking

Gye Green, The Lady, and The Kid went to the local shopping centre to run a few errands. Unusually, I came with.

While The Lady and The Kid were eating in the food court -- The Lady has a sentimental attachment to McDingo's breakfasts -- GG and I nipped out to a printing shop located on the exterior of the shopping mall. We were curious as to their prices for printing a *.jpg onto a t-shirt.

As we left the mall entrance we noticed three males, perhaps twelve to fourteen years of age, sitting on a bench and sharing a cigarette between themselves. The printing shop was immediately to the right of the bench, and closed on Sundays.

As we returned to the mall entrance, GG made alternating eye contact with each of the boys and asked, ''You do know that that stuff is bad for you, don't you?'' ''Huh?'' one of the boys replied.

''Smoking's bad for you. You know that, right?'' GG elaborated, as we continued to walk past. The boys mumbled something, and continued -- presumably -- to continue sharing the cigarette.


GG and I discussed his behaviour on the way back to the food court. He said that he didn't fully expect to change their behavior by ''calling them out''. At the same time, he did not feel that he could say nothing -- and, by allowing a behavior to continue without comment, tacitly approving. He says that if people do not comment against wrongs, then people will not realize that others disapprove, and thus continue their behaviour.

He acknowledged, however, that there is a time and a place. We saw those three young males, intentionally -- or ignorantly, in the felt invulnerability of youth -- shortening their lifespan even as their wide potential lay in front of them. Apparently, he felt that this was a worthy time and place.


Seeing these young people smoking made me sad.

Later in the day, we say a trio of teenaged males secretly -- so we thought -- distributing cigarettes among themselves. Again, GG commented on it to them.


What causes people to smoke? GG says there is a fair body of research on this, and one of the largest predictors is simply having parents who smoke. Unfortunately, this obscures whether it is some biological tendency, learned or socialized behavior, or a combination of the two. But certainly, it must be hard for parents to convince their teens to not smoke, when seeing adults smoke has been a normal and natural part of their youth.


I used to think that people who smoke were either ignorant, gullible, or weak. Although I think that still holds true to some extent, it is also consistent with what GG told me: that most adults who smoke, began as teens or before. Indeed: teens can often be ignorant and gullible. And they can be weak -- not having fully developed the level of resolve that they will have as adults.


The more cynical would say that it is simply Darwinian. Technically, it is not truly Darwinian, as they will likely reproduce before dying from conditions related to smoking.

In all, seeing anyone smoke -- in particular, people who are kind to others -- makes me sad.


--TG